enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of notable patent law cases in the United States in chronological order. The cases have been decided notably by the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) or the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). While the Federal Circuit (CAFC) sits below the Supreme Court ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Schillinger v. United States: 155 U.S. 163: 1894: Patent infringement claim against the United States cannot be asserted. Black Diamond Coal Mining Company v. Excelsior Coal Company: 156 U.S. 611: 1895: Consolidated Electric Light Co v. McKeesport Light Co: 159 U.S. 465: 1895: Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Medart: 158 U.S. 68: 1895: Boyden ...

  4. Amgen Inc v. Sanofi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amgen_Inc_v._Sanofi

    Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 598 U.S. 594 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Amgen's two patent applications on cholesterol-lowering drugs failed to satisfy the enablement clause of §112 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 112(a).

  5. US Supreme Court won't review Apple's win against $503 ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-wont-review...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear patent-licensing company VirnetX's bid to revive a $502.8 million jury verdict it won against Apple in a dispute over internet-security patents.

  6. Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_University_v...

    Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. 776 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that title in a patented invention vests first in the inventor, even if the inventor is a researcher at a federally funded lab subject to the 1980 Bayh–Dole Act. [1]

  7. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v...

    Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. [1]

  8. United States Patents Quarterly - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patents...

    The United States Patents Quarterly (U.S.P.Q.) is a United States legal reporter published by the Bloomberg Industry Group [1] in Washington, D.C. The U.S.P.Q. covers intellectual property cases including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, from 1913 to the present. The publisher stopped the sequence of volume numbers and ...

  9. OpenAI cites US roots to dodge India courts, but lawyers say ...

    www.aol.com/news/analysis-openai-cites-us-roots...

    NEW DELHI (Reuters) -OpenAI faces an uphill climb as it argues that Indian courts cannot hear lawsuits about its U.S.-based business in the country, where Telegram has failed with similar defences ...