Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A self-published source can be independent, authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, and expert-approved. Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used (but not for third-party claims about living people). Sometimes, a self-published source is even the best possible source or among the best sources. For example:
The first published source for any given fact is always considered a primary source. The historians' concept has been extended into other fields, with partial success. Wikipedia, like many institutions, has its own lexicon. Wikipedia does not use these terms exactly like academics use them.
Source material must be published, on Wikipedia meaning made available to the public in some form. [f] Unpublished material is not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context.
Wikipedia editors have created custom Google search engines to help find sources on websites that Wikipedia editors have determined are generally more reliable. Several general search engines exist for more academic material, particularly scholarly articles, although some content will be behind a paywall: examples are Google Scholar , BASE and ...
This concept is unrelated to whether a source is self-published. A self-published source is made available to the public ("published") by or at the direction of the person or entity that created it. Blog posts by consumers about their personal experiences with a product are completely independent, self-published sources.
In Wikipedia, verifiability means that people reading and editing the encyclopedia can check that information comes from a reliable source. No original research ( WP:NOR ) – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source .
A self-published source is material, online or in print, that has been published by the author, or whose publisher is a vanity press, web hosting service, or other organization that provides little or no editorial oversight. The expression "self-published source" may also refer to the author of the material.
A third-party source from one article may be treated as an auxiliary source in another, because the focus has changed. [6] Generally, any source that does not qualify as a reliable third-party source is grouped in this category. The use of these raw, first-hand, or out-of-date sources lends itself to inaccurate reporting, undue weight, and ...