Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
These individuals, the so-called consular tribunes ("military tribunes with consular powers" or tribuni militum consulari potestate) were elected by the Centuriate Assembly, and the Senate had the power to veto any such election. [4] This was the first of many attempts by the plebeians to achieve political equality with the Patricians.
Map of the Roman Empire with the distribution of Christian congregations of the first three centuries AD. The growth of Early Christianity from its obscure origin c. AD 40, with fewer than 1,000 followers, to being the majority religion of the entire Roman Empire by AD 400, has been examined through a wide variety of historiographical approaches.
If a magistrate, the senate, or any other assembly disregarded the orders of a tribune, he could "interpose the sacrosanctity of his person" to prevent such action. Even a dictator (and presumably an interrex) was not exempted from the veto power, [7] although some sources may suggest the contrary. [1] The tribunes could veto acts of the Roman ...
In 48 BC, Caesar was given permanent tribunician powers, [85] which made his person sacrosanct, [86] allowed him to veto the Roman Senate, [25] and allowed him to dominate the Plebeian Council. Since Tribunes were always elected by the Plebeian Council, [52] Caesar had hoped to prevent the election of Tribunes who might oppose him. [85]
Aeneas, whom the Romans believed Romulus and Remus descended from, fleeing from the burning city of Troy. The second epoch saw the reigns of the last three legendary kings. The second epoch was more consequential than was the first, which was in part due to the significant degree of territorial expansion which occurred during this period. [2]
Therefore, the Roman Constitution was used as a template, often the only one, when the first constitutions of the modern era were being drafted. Because of this, many modern constitutions have superstructures which are similar, or even identical (such as a separation of powers and checks and balances) to the Roman Constitution.
The legislative powers of the imperial senate were principally of a financial and an administrative nature, although the senate did retain a range of powers over the provinces. [25] During the early empire, all judicial powers that had been held by the Roman assemblies were also transferred to the senate.
In Roman constitutional law, the assemblies were a sovereign authority, with the power to enact or reject any law, confer any magistracies, and make any decision. [6] This view of popular sovereignty emerged elegantly out of the Roman conception that the people and the state (or government) were one and the same. [17]