enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Parker v. Ellis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_v._Ellis

    Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court decision (per curiam) in which the court granted certiorari to review dismissal of petitioner's application for a habeas corpus review. The petitioner claimed that his conviction in a state court had violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. However, the ...

  3. Marbury v. Madison - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

    Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.

  4. Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    Case names before the court are styled petitioner v. respondent, regardless of which party initiated the lawsuit in the trial court. For example, criminal prosecutions are brought in the name of the state and against an individual, as in State of Arizona v. Ernesto Miranda.

  5. Service of process - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_process

    In the U.S. legal system, service of process is the procedure by which a party to a lawsuit gives an appropriate notice of initial legal action to another party (such as a defendant), court, or administrative body in an effort to exercise jurisdiction over that person so as to force that person to respond to the proceeding in a court, body, or other tribunal.

  6. Petition for review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petition_for_review

    If a jurisdiction utilizes petitions for review, then parties seeking appellate review of their case may submit a formal petition for review to an appropriate court. [2] In United States federal courts, the term "petition for review" is also used to describe petitions that seek review of federal agency actions. [3]

  7. Daimler AG v. Bauman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daimler_AG_v._Bauman

    Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court answered whether an American court may exercise jurisdiction over a foreign company based on the fact that a subsidiary of the company acts on its behalf in the jurisdictional state. [1]

  8. Discretionary jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discretionary_jurisdiction

    This petitioner must file a notice to invoke within 10 days of filing the notice petitioner must submit a jurisdictional brief to the Supreme Court. [7] If subject to the State's Supreme Court's jurisdiction. a panel of five justices, one of whom oversees the preparation of a memorandum analyzing whether there is a basis for the court's ...

  9. Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_jurisdiction_of...

    The constitutional grant of original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court cannot be expanded by statute. In the case of Marbury v. Madison, [4] the newly-elected president, Thomas Jefferson, ordered his acting Secretary of State not to deliver commissions for appointments that had been made by his predecessor, John Adams.