enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mutual exclusivity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_exclusivity

    If just one card is drawn from the deck, either a red card (heart or diamond) or a black card (club or spade) will be drawn. When A and B are mutually exclusive, P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B). [3] To find the probability of drawing a red card or a club, for example, add together the probability of drawing a red card and the probability of drawing a ...

  3. De Morgan's laws - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws

    De Morgan's laws represented with Venn diagrams.In each case, the resultant set is the set of all points in any shade of blue. In propositional logic and Boolean algebra, De Morgan's laws, [1] [2] [3] also known as De Morgan's theorem, [4] are a pair of transformation rules that are both valid rules of inference.

  4. Probability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability

    The opposite or complement of an event A is the event [not A] (that is, the event of A not occurring), often denoted as ′,, ¯,,, or ; its probability is given by P(not A) = 1 − P(A). [31] As an example, the chance of not rolling a six on a six-sided die is 1 – (chance of rolling a six) = 1 − ⁠ 1 / 6 ⁠ = ⁠ 5 / 6 ⁠ .

  5. Birthday problem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem

    The goal is to compute P(B), the probability that at least two people in the room have the same birthday. However, it is simpler to calculate P(A′), the probability that no two people in the room have the same birthday. Then, because B and A′ are the only two possibilities and are also mutually exclusive, P(B) = 1 − P(A′).

  6. List of paradoxes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paradoxes

    Intransitive dice: One can have three dice, called A, B, and C, such that A is likely to win in a roll against B, B is likely to win in a roll against C, and C is likely to win in a roll against A. Monty Hall problem , also known as the Monty Hall paradox: [ 2 ] An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability.

  7. Conditional independence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_independence

    Events A and B can be assumed to be independent i.e. knowledge that A is late has minimal to no change on the probability that B will be late. However, if a third event is introduced, person A and person B live in the same neighborhood, the two events are now considered not conditionally independent.

  8. Almost surely - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_surely

    In probability experiments on a finite sample space with a non-zero probability for each outcome, there is no difference between almost surely and surely (since having a probability of 1 entails including all the sample points); however, this distinction becomes important when the sample space is an infinite set, [2] because an infinite set can ...

  9. Probability axioms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_axioms

    This is called the addition law of probability, or the sum rule. That is, the probability that an event in A or B will happen is the sum of the probability of an event in A and the probability of an event in B, minus the probability of an event that is in both A and B. The proof of this is as follows: Firstly,