Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Translate the matrices of the most deeply nested quantifiers into disjunctive normal form, consisting of disjuncts of conjuncts of terms, negating atomic terms as required. The resulting subformula contains only negation, conjunction, disjunction, and existential quantification.
In logic, a quantifier is an operator that specifies how many individuals in the domain of discourse satisfy an open formula.For instance, the universal quantifier in the first order formula () expresses that everything in the domain satisfies the property denoted by .
Bound variables within nested quantifiers are handled by increasing the subscript by one for each successive quantifier. This leads to rule 4, which must be applied after the other rules since rules 1 and 2 produce quantified variables.
The first-order quantifiers are not restricted. By analogy to Fagin's theorem , according to which existential (non-monadic) second-order logic captures precisely the descriptive complexity of the complexity class NP , the class of problems that may be expressed in existential monadic second-order logic has been called monadic NP.
In mathematical logic, the quantifier rank of a formula is the depth of nesting of its quantifiers. It plays an essential role in model theory . Notice that the quantifier rank is a property of the formula itself (i.e. the expression in a language).
In computer science and mathematical logic, satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) is the problem of determining whether a mathematical formula is satisfiable.It generalizes the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) to more complex formulas involving real numbers, integers, and/or various data structures such as lists, arrays, bit vectors, and strings.
A counting quantifier is a mathematical term for a quantifier of the form "there exists at least k elements that satisfy property X". In first-order logic with equality, counting quantifiers can be defined in terms of ordinary quantifiers, so in this context they are a notational shorthand.
For example, the quantifier ∀ A, which can be viewed as set-theoretic inclusion, satisfies all of the above except [symmetry]. Clearly [symmetry] holds for ∃ A while e.g. [contraposition] fails. A semantic interpretation of conditional quantifiers involves a relation between sets of subsets of a given structure—i.e. a relation between ...