enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of distributed file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_distributed...

    Some researchers have made a functional and experimental analysis of several distributed file systems including HDFS, Ceph, Gluster, Lustre and old (1.6.x) version of MooseFS, although this document is from 2013 and a lot of information are outdated (e.g. MooseFS had no HA for Metadata Server at that time).

  3. Moose File System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moose_File_System

    The MooseFS follows similar design principles as Fossil, Google File System, Lustre or Ceph. The file system comprises three components: Metadata server (MDS) — manages the location (layout) of files, file access and namespace hierarchy. The current version of MooseFS does support multiple metadata servers and automatic failover. Clients only ...

  4. Comparison of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems

    Note that in addition to the below table, block capabilities can be implemented below the file system layer in Linux (LVM, integritysetup, cryptsetup) or Windows (Volume Shadow Copy Service, SECURITY), etc.

  5. List of file systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems

    Moose File System (MooseFS) is a networking, distributed file system. It spreads data over several physical locations (servers), which are visible to a user as one resource. Works on Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenSolaris and macOS. Master server and chunkservers can also run on Solaris and Windows with Cygwin.

  6. LizardFS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LizardFS

    LizardFS is an open source distributed file system that is POSIX-compliant and licensed under GPLv3. [3] [4] It was released in 2013 as fork of MooseFS. [5]LizardFS is also offering a paid technical support (Standard, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus) with possibility of configurating and setting up the cluster and active cluster monitoring.

  7. Comparison of disc image software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_disc_image...

    Name Creates [a] Modifies? [b]Mounts? [c]Writes/ Burns? [d]Extracts? [e]Input format [f] Output format [g] OS License; 7-Zip: Yes: No: No: No: Yes: CramFS, DMG, FAT ...

  8. Gluster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluster

    GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system. It has found applications including cloud computing , streaming media services, and content delivery networks. GlusterFS was developed originally by Gluster, Inc. and then by Red Hat , Inc., as a result of Red Hat acquiring Gluster in 2011.

  9. Comparison of executable file formats - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_executable...

    Windows, ReactOS, HX DOS Extender, BeOS (R3 only).EXE: Yes by file Yes Yes Yes [5] Yes Yes No Only MZ (DOS) [6] Yes PE32+ Windows (64-bit editions only).EXE: Yes by file Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes "Compiled Hybrid Portable Executable" Yes Mach-O [7] NeXTSTEP, macOS, iOS, watchOS, tvOS: none Yes by section Some (limited to max. 256 sections) Yes ...