Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Young diagram representing visually a polite expansion 15 = 4 + 5 + 6. In number theory, a polite number is a positive integer that can be written as the sum of two or more consecutive positive integers. A positive integer which is not polite is called impolite.
G(3) is at least 4 (since cubes are congruent to 0, 1 or −1 mod 9); for numbers less than 1.3 × 10 9, 1 290 740 is the last to require 6 cubes, and the number of numbers between N and 2N requiring 5 cubes drops off with increasing N at sufficient speed to have people believe that G(3) = 4; [17] the largest number now known not to be a sum of ...
A number that has the same number of digits as the number of digits in its prime factorization, including exponents but excluding exponents equal to 1. A046758 Extravagant numbers
70 is the fourth discrete sphenic number, as the first of the form . [1] It is the smallest weird number, a natural number that is abundant but not semiperfect, [2] where it is also the second-smallest primitive abundant number, after 20. 70 is in equivalence with the sum between the smallest number that is the sum of two abundant numbers, and the largest that is not (24, 46).
Every integer greater than 20161 can be written as the sum of two abundant numbers. The largest even number that is not the sum of two abundant numbers is 46. [5] An abundant number which is not a semiperfect number is called a weird number. [6] An abundant number with abundance 1 is called a quasiperfect number, although none have yet been found.
A number n that has more divisors than any x < n is a highly composite number (though the first two such numbers are 1 and 2). Composite numbers have also been called "rectangular numbers", but that name can also refer to the pronic numbers, numbers that are the product of two consecutive integers.
In particular, for a prime number p we have the explicit formula r 4 (p) = 8(p + 1). [2] Some values of r 4 (n) occur infinitely often as r 4 (n) = r 4 (2 m n) whenever n is even. The values of r 4 (n) can be arbitrarily large: indeed, r 4 (n) is infinitely often larger than . [2]
Lemma: The sum of any non-empty set of distinct, non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers whose largest member is F j is strictly less than the next larger Fibonacci number F j + 1 . The lemma can be proven by induction on j. Now take two non-empty sets and of distinct non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers which have the same sum, =.