Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. The ruling made it possible for The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers to publish the then- classified Pentagon Papers without risk of government ...
New York Times Co. v. United States moved quickly to the Supreme Court; oral arguments by The New York Times ' s legal defense, led by Alexander Bickel, were heard on June 26. In a 6-to-3 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in a landmark decision that the Times and The Washington Post , who began publishing the Pentagon Papers on June 18 after ...
The appeals court, however, had agreed with Consumers Union that under the precedent set by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the appeals court had to review the entire matter de novo in order to determine whether the false fact was published with "actual malice." As Bose had not presented sufficient evidence of actual malice, the appeals ...
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film was found to receive a generally positive reception, with 75% of critics giving the movie favorable reviews. [5] Some critics favored the film's examination of Moore's methods. [3] The film was also nominated for Best Documentary from the New York International Independent Film and Video Festival.
Moʻorea (English: / ˌ m oʊ. oʊ ˈ r eɪ. ɑː / or / ˈ m oʊ. oʊ r eɪ /; [4] Tahitian: Moʻoreʻa, [moʔore(ʔ)a]), also spelled Moorea, is a volcanic island in French Polynesia.It is one of the Windward Islands, a group that is part of the Society Islands, 17 kilometres (11 mi) northwest of Tahiti.
New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941), and censorship of motion pictures in Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago, 365 U.S. 43 (1961). [42] In New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1971)—better known as the Pentagon Papers case—the government had sought to prevent the publication of classified material by The New York Times.
The case is New York Times Co v Microsoft Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 23-11195. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama ...
A portion of stockholders believed that The New-York Times should consolidate with The New York Recorder to form the Times-Recorder Company. [6] Efforts to consolidate the two companies fell through after Miller and Edward Cary put the Times into the receivership of Alfred Ely , who doubted Ochs's ability to stave off Hearst, Pulitzer, and ...