enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_the_Republic...

    The respondents based their claim on two constitutional provisions: section 26 of the Constitution, which provides that everyone has the right of access to adequate housing, thereby imposing an obligation on the State to take reasonable legislative and other measures to ensure the progressive realisation of this right within its available resources; and

  3. Irene Grootboom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_Grootboom

    Irene Grootboom (c. 1969 – 2008) was a South African housing rights activist best known for her victory before the Constitutional Court in 2000. [1] The Court found that the government had not met its obligation to provide adequate alternative housing for the residents of Kraaifontein ’s Wallacedene informal settlement .

  4. Right to housing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_housing

    The rights such as the right to public participation, equality, human dignity, and access to information are amongst the cross cutting rights linked with right to adequate housing as noted by the Constitutional Court in Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC) [11]

  5. Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Government_of_the...

    Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others. Add languages. Add links. Article; Talk; English. Read; Edit; View history; Tools. Tools ...

  6. Wallacedene - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallacedene

    By 2004, Wallacedene had an estimated population of 21,000 people. The housing rights activist Irene Grootboom lived in Wallacedene. [2] Grootboom and other inhabitants won a Constitutional Court ruling in 2000 which stated that they could not be evicted without being offered alternative accommodation. [3]

  7. Soobramoney v Minister of Health, KwaZulu-Natal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soobramoney_v_Minister_of...

    The Grootboom reasonableness test was applied by the Constitutional Court in the Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign case (2002). The claimant argued that the Ministry of Health infringed section 27(3) Constitution of South Africa by failing to distribute the free medicine nevirapine that could prevent mother-to-child transmission of ...

  8. Residents of Joe Slovo Community v Thubelisha Homes

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residents_of_Joe_Slovo...

    Residents of Joe Slovo Community, Western Cape v Thubelisha Homes and Others (Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions and Another, Amici Curiae) [1] is an important case in South African property law, heard by the Constitutional Court [2] on August 21, 2008, with judgment handed down on June 10.

  9. Grootboom and Others v Government of the Republic of South ...

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Grootboom_and_Others_v...

    What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code