enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wal-Mart Hit With Another Gender Discrimination Class ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2011-11-02-wal-mart-sued-for...

    Wal-Mart discriminated against female employees in its 451 Texas stores, according to a class action lawsuit filed Friday. Four months ago, the Supreme Court threw out a nationwide class action ...

  3. List of gender equality lawsuits - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_gender_equality...

    employment discrimination based on sex: San Francisco County Superior Court: 2015 Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney: hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans: Supreme Court of the United States: 1979 R v Sullivan: status of a fetus as a person, with implications for women's rights: Supreme Court of Canada: 1991 Rajender v.

  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wal-Mart_Stores,_Inc._v._Dukes

    Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes, a Walmart employee, and others alleged gender ...

  5. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

  6. "As a black woman working in corporate America for 20 years, I share similar stories of many women and women of color [in] gender inequality, microaggression based on race and general bigotry, and ...

  7. Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_Express,_Inc._v...

    Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights case which ruled that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employees could not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

  8. Texas school hair policy that left Black teen suspended for ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-rules-texas-school-hair...

    A judge ruled that a Texas high school was not violating the CROWN Act by punishing a Black teen over the length of his dreadlocks. ... which prohibits race-based hair discrimination at work ...

  9. LGBTQ rights in Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_Texas

    As of to date, no Texas state law protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. [103] Since at least 1999, no bill prohibiting discrimination by employers based on sexual orientation or gender identity has made it out of the committee stage in the Texas Legislature. [104]

  1. Related searches gender based discrimination examples in the workplace cases report in texas

    list of lawsuits against genderlawsuits against gender equality