Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sponsored by senators, Birch Bayh of Indiana and Bob Dole of Kansas, the Act was adopted in 1980, is codified at 94 Stat. 3015, and in 35 U.S.C. §§ 200–212, [1] and is implemented by 37 C.F.R. 401 for federal funding agreements with contractors [2] and 37 C.F.R 404 for licensing of inventions owned by the federal government. [3]
Pevsner v. Commissioner, 628 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1980) [1] is a United States federal income tax case before the Fifth Circuit.It dealt with the issue of whether clothes purchased solely for use at work could be treated as a business expense deduction on a taxpayer's return.
R is the absolute amount of royalty paid OP R is the profit-before-tax during the royalty-applicable period. Expression C can be rewritten as: LSEP = 1/ (1 + OP R /R) - D or as LSEP = 1 / (1+TTF) - E where TTF is defined as the Technology Turnover Factor. It is a measure of the profit or return that the enterprise obtains for a unit of royalty ...
Government patent use law is a statute codified at 28 USC § 1498(a) [1] that is a "form of government immunity from patent claims." [2] [1] Section 1498 gives the federal government of the United States the "right to use patented inventions without permission, while paying the patent holder 'reasonable and entire compensation' which is usually "set at ten percent of sales or less".
Reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms, also known as fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, denote a voluntary licensing commitment that standards organizations often request from the owner of an intellectual property right (usually a patent) that is, or may become, essential to practice a technical standard. [1]
When businesses require legal counsel on complex tax issues or need representation in a tax dispute involving the IRS, the fees paid are generally deductible as a business expense. Tax planning ...
Stay updated on the news about taxes, deadlines, deductions, laws, the IRS, and all things related to your income taxes.
The term "cross licensing" implies that neither party pays monetary royalties to the other party, although this may be the case. For example, Microsoft and JVC entered into a cross license agreement in January 2008. [3] Each party, therefore, is able to practice the inventions covered by the patents included in the agreement. [4]