enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    In Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) Justice Harlan issued a concurring opinion articulating the two-prong test later adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court as the test for determining whether a police or government search is subject to the limitations of the Fourth Amendment:

  4. List of American films of 1967 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_films_of_1967

    Title Director Cast Genre Notes Easy Come, Easy Go: John Rich: Elvis Presley, Dodie Marshall, Pat Priest, Skip Ward, Pat Harrington Jr., Sandy Kenyon: Musical: Paramount: Eight on the Lam

  5. List of consent to search case law articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_consent_to_search...

    Katz v. United States (1967) - telephone booth has reasonable expectation of privacy; Burger Court (1969–1986) Frazier v. Cupp (1969) - one person can give ...

  6. Minimally invasive warrantless search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimally_invasive_warrant...

    In Katz v.United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), electronic eavesdropping devices attached to the outside of a phonebooth or a home were deemed to violate the unreasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because the interior private life of the homeowners was exposed along with information about illegal activity.

  7. How to get your share of Oracle's $115 million class-action ...

    www.aol.com/share-oracles-115-million-class...

    Amaris Encinas, USA TODAY. September 20, 2024 at 6:36 PM. ... Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement Administrator1650 Arch Street, Suite 2210Philadelphia, PA 19103.

  8. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    Fourth Amendment protections expanded significantly with Katz v. United States (1967). [56] [58] In Katz, the Supreme Court expanded that focus to embrace an individual's right to privacy, and ruled that a search had occurred when the government wiretapped a telephone booth using a microphone

  9. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    In response to Katz v. United States (1967) and Berger v. New York (1967), the United States Congress enacted the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, of which Title III is known as the "Wiretap Act." Title III was Congress' attempt to extend Fourth Amendment-like protections to telephonic and other wired forms of communication.