Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2002 Abercrombie & Fitch released a line of thong underwear targeted for girls ages 10–16, though critics pointed out that children as young as seven could fit one of the thongs. [52] [53] [54] A spokesman for A&F, Hampton Carney, stated that he could list "at least 100 reasons why a young girl would want thong underwear."
Abercrombie Kids Prep-school by Abercrombie & Fitch [89] Themed as "classic cool" for kids 7 through 14, [3] this is the children's version of Abercrombie & Fitch. Hollister Co. Southern California by Abercrombie & Fitch [89] Themed after "SoCal" for teenagers 14 through 18, [3] with significantly lower prices than its parent brand. Gilly Hicks
Trubble embroidered. Ruehl No.925 was an upscale clothing brand owned by Abercrombie & Fitch, selling apparel, leather goods, and luxury goods.Themed after New York City's Greenwich Village, the store was meant to attract post-graduate individuals aged 22 to 35, competing primarily with J.Crew, Polo Ralph Lauren, and American Eagle Outfitters' equally short-lived spinoff Martin + Osa.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Dozens of men have filed a class action lawsuit alleging Abercrombie & Fitch was complicit in a multi-decade-long sex trafficking scheme carried out by the fashion company’s former CEO Mike ...
White Hot: The Rise & Fall of Abercrombie & Fitch details the store's success and controversies, including its racist and exclusionary practices. The documentary focuses on the rise in popularity of the brand after the arrival of CEO Mike Jeffries in 1992, and his practices which led to a 2003 class-action suit which alleged racial discrimination in the stores’ hiring policies. [7]
Kohl’s offers a variety of products to choose from, such as clothing, shoes and electronics. Finding the perfect gift that you’re willing to drop some cash for doesn’t have to be difficult.
In June 1998, Abercrombie & Fitch filed a lawsuit against rival clothing retailer American Eagle Outfitters in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleging that "AE impermissibly copied the designs of certain articles of clothing, in-store advertising displays, and a catalog [A&F Quarterly]."