Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
$64 million verdict on behalf of an injured ironworker who fell and was left paralyzed from a job-site accident. The verdict was noted as the highest jury verdict in Illinois history for an individual, beating the previous record verdict of $51 million. [6] [7] The National Law Journal recognized the verdict in their Top 100 verdicts of 2012. [8]
On January 11, 2016, Gaye's family moved an application for approximately $3.5 million in attorney's fee and costs on the grounds that the jury verdict prevailed on merits, rather than on a technical issue. [16] The Court denied the application and ordered further submissions on the issue of costs.
After further proceedings, the Federal Circuit remanded the case to the district court, for it to reinstate the 2008 jury verdict of infringement and the $40 million plus lost profits award. [18] [19] Limelight announced its intention to appeal the judgment to the U.S. Supreme Court, [20] and on January 26, 2016, filed a certiorari petition. [21]
A jury’s unanimous verdict “was almost entirely” in her favor, but of “the only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had ‘raped’ her ...
A few days later, the plaintiffs proposed a $25,000 settlement to Thomas-Rasset. She declined. [26] The plaintiffs then rejected the damage reduction ordered by the judge. [27] On June 18, the court appointed a special master to facilitate negotiations due to the parties' failure to reach a settlement. [28]
Defense lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove -- who Trump last month nominated to top positions in the Department of Justice -- claimed to have uncovered evidence of juror misconduct that calls into ...
The jury apparently took account of the fact that you can send either the cops or the social workers, or both, and still be confronted by harrowing “boundary work” on the scene. You will face ...
In a 3–0 decision, the court upheld the jury verdict against Oberlin and the cap in damages awarded to Gibson's. [46] The court ruled that a reasonable jury would have concluded the Senate Resolution could not have had the effect it did without the assistance from Oberlin, and therefore the college was not entitled to a JNOV.