enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

    United States v. Alvarez , 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal.

  3. American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Booksellers_Ass'n...

    American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut, 771 F.2d 323 (7th Cir. 1985), [1] aff'd mem., 475 U.S. 1001 (1986), was a 1985 court case that successfully challenged the constitutionality of the Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance, as enacted in Indianapolis, Indiana the previous year.

  4. United States v. National Treasury Employees Union - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._National...

    Associate Justice John Paul Stevens authored the majority opinion. Citing the test put forward in Pickering v.Board of Education of Township High School District 205, the Court found that the restriction put in place in Section 501(b) of the Act "constitutes a wholesale deterrent to a broad category of expression by a massive number of potential speakers" requiring an even greater burden than ...

  5. Gonzalez v. Trevino - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Trevino

    Gonzalez v. Trevino, 602 U.S. 653 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that plaintiffs alleging retaliatory arrest need only provide evidence that their arrest occurred in circumstances where probable cause exists to arrest, but officers typically exercise discretion and decline to arrest. [1]

  6. National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Endowment_for_the...

    National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act, as amended in 1990, (20 U.S.C. § 954(d)(1)), was facially valid, as it neither inherently interfered with First Amendment rights nor violated constitutional vagueness principles.

  7. Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Community_Access...

    In December 2016, The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the case, following arguments from the city and MNN, and following the Supreme Court's own decision from Denver Area that declined to settle whether public access systems were considered state actors. The District Court found, "In short, there is ...

  8. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_Arts...

    San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. United States Olympic Committee, 483 U.S. 522 (1987), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting the trademark rights of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) to regulate the use of the word "Olympic" under the Amateur Sports Act of 1978.

  9. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_&_Schuster,_Inc._v...

    Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board , 502 U.S. 105 (1991), was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws , which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals from publishing books about their crime for profit . [ 1 ]

  1. Related searches united states v. alvarez holding center for the arts and music education

    us v alvarez wikipediastolen valor v alvarez