Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Hepting v. AT&T, 439 F.Supp.2d 974 (N.D. Cal., 2006), was a class action lawsuit argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) on behalf of customers of the telecommunications company AT&T.
Many of these cases have lead to class action lawsuits and proceedings by ... AT&T. Total settlement: $60 million. ... May 18, 2023. Requirements: Must have been an unlimited data customer between ...
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...
Keele Valley Landfill#Resident class action lawsuit; Kemper Corporation#Class-action lawsuit; Kids for cash scandal#Victim lawsuits; Kweku Hanson#Class action lawsuit against Ocwen Federal FSB; Lead contamination in Washington, D.C. drinking water#Class-action lawsuit; Long-term effects of benzodiazepines#Class-action lawsuit; Lowe's#Lawsuits
Usually, if you are part of a class involved in a class-action lawsuit, you don’t play any role in the suit until it is done. You just sit tight until the case goes to trial or settles.
In the United States, the class representative, also called a lead plaintiff, named plaintiff, or representative plaintiff, is the named party in a class-action lawsuit. [66] Although the class representative is named as a party to the litigation, the court must approve the class representative when it certifies the lawsuit as a class action.
A recently announced class action lawsuit filed against T-Mobile alleges the company has disguised a hidden fee as a government charge for two decades.. The wireless network allegedly ...
Hepting v. AT&T is a US class action lawsuit filed in January 2006 by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) against the telecommunications company AT&T, in which the EFF alleges that AT&T permitted and assisted the National Security Agency (NSA) in unlawfully monitoring the communications of the United States, including AT&T customers, businesses and third parties whose communications were ...