enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. John Gartner (psychologist) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gartner_(psychologist)

    The petition, "Mental Health Professionals Declare Trump is Mentally Ill And Must Be Removed", was sent to the Minority leader, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York. [7] At the end of April 2017, Gartner sent the petition to Washington D.C., with more than 41,000 signatures. [3] According to Gartner, Trump's mental handicaps are a mixture of ...

  3. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    Duty to warn is embedded in the historical context of two rulings (1974 and 1976) of the California Supreme Court in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. [15] [page needed] [16] The court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient ...

  4. The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dangerous_Case_of...

    The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump is a 2017 book edited by Bandy X. Lee, a forensic psychiatrist, containing essays from 27 psychiatrists, psychologists, and other mental health professionals describing the "clear and present danger" that US President Donald Trump's mental health poses to the "nation and individual well being". [1]

  5. 233 Mental Health Professionals Spell Out Dangers Of Donald ...

    www.aol.com/233-mental-health-professionals...

    "We have a duty to warn the public about the grave danger posed by returning this man to power." 233 Mental Health Professionals Spell Out Dangers Of Donald Trump In Chilling Letter Skip to main ...

  6. Justices to Determine Scope of Mental Health Professionals ...

    www.aol.com/news/justices-determine-scope-mental...

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether mental health professionals have a duty to warn of threats against a group of unspecified individuals.

  7. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  8. Calmes: Donald Trump's state of mind should be under debate - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/calmes-donald-trumps-state-mind...

    During Trump’s presidency, however, several dozen professionals invoked a civic “duty to warn”; they wrote and later expanded a bestseller assessing Trump’s psychological maladies.

  9. The Best Way To Save People From Suicide - The Huffington Post

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/articles/en/how-to...

    It outwardly signals hope, but on the inside, clinic personnel are consumed by paperwork, funding stress, liability concerns, impossible caseloads and the ever-changing and byzantine ways people qualify for help. “We train mental health professionals to be terrified of all things,” she said.