Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Climate change sceptics gained wide publicity in blogs and news media, [32] making allegations that the hacked emails showed evidence that climate scientists manipulated data. [8] A few other commentators such as Roger A. Pielke [ 47 ] said that the evidence supported claims that dissenting scientific papers had been suppressed. [ 48 ]
Climate change deniers gained wide publicity for allegations that the hacked e-mails showed climate scientists colluded in manipulating data, [11] withheld scientific information, [5] and tried to prevent dissenting scientific papers from being published in peer reviewed journals. Academics and climate change researchers said that nothing in ...
Some climate change deniers assert that the scientific consensus on climate change is based on conspiracies to produce manipulated data or suppress dissent. It is one of a number of tactics used in climate change denial to attempt to manufacture political and public controversy disputing this consensus. [ 4 ]
The story was first broken by climate change denialists, [66] [67] who argued that the emails showed that global warming was a scientific conspiracy and that scientists manipulated climate data and attempted to suppress critics.
World leaders are meeting in Paris this month in what amounts to a last-ditch effort to avert the worst ravages of climate change. Climatologists now say that the best case scenario — assuming immediate and dramatic emissions curbs — is that planetary surface temperatures will increase by at least 2 degrees Celsius in the coming decades.
A now-former forensic scientist with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) manipulated DNA test results in hundreds of criminal cases, an internal affairs investigation found, which prompted ...
Watts Up With That? (WUWT) is a blog [1] promoting climate change denial [7] that was created by Anthony Watts in 2006.[2] [3]The blog predominantly discusses climate issues with a focus on anthropogenic climate change, generally accommodating beliefs that are in opposition to the scientific consensus on climate change.
Preclinical data appeared to have been manipulated, the report authors allege. In addition, the Phase II results appear to contain errors that would skew interpretation of the data in favor of the ...