enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Roldan v. Los Angeles County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roldan_v._Los_Angeles_County

    Roldan v. Los Angeles County, 129 Cal. App. 267, 18 P.2d 706, was a 1933 court case in California confirming that the state's anti-miscegenation laws at the time did not bar the marriage of a Filipino and a white person. [1] However, the precedent lasted barely a week before the law was specifically amended to illegalize such marriages. [2]

  3. Hadacheck v. Sebastian - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadacheck_v._Sebastian

    Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U.S. 394 (1915), was an early U.S. Supreme Court case on the constitutionality of zoning ordinances. [1] The Court held that an ordinance of Los Angeles, California, prohibiting the manufacturing of bricks within specified limits of the city did not unconstitutionally deprive the petitioner of his property without due process of law, or deny him equal protection of ...

  4. Regents of University of California v. Superior Court of Los ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_University_of...

    Regents of the University of California v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County , 4 Cal. 5th 607, 413 P.3d 656 (2018), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that universities owe a duty to protect students from foreseeable violence during curricular activities.

  5. Madrigal v. Quilligan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrigal_v._Quilligan

    Quilligan was a 1978 federal class action lawsuit from Los Angeles County, California, involving sterilization of Latina women that occurred either without informed consent, or through coercion. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Although the judge ruled in favor of the doctors, the case led to better informed consent for patients, especially those who are not native ...

  6. Garcetti v. Ceballos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos

    Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant.

  7. Jay-Z’s attorney says rape claim against him is made up ...

    www.aol.com/news/jay-z-attorney-says-rape...

    Jay-Z’s lawyer Alex Spiro told reporters in New York on Monday that allegations from a woman who has accused the hip-hop mogul of sexually assaulting her with Sean “Diddy” Combs back in 2000 ...

  8. Paternity fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud

    Knowingly making a false statement on a public document is a criminal offence, including naming someone who is not the biological father. As of 2008, no individual has been prosecuted in a case involving paternity fraud. [26] A mother is permitted to not state the name of the biological father if she does not know it. [27]

  9. Cartel leader's son-in-law faked death to enable 'life of ...

    www.aol.com/news/cartel-leaders-son-law-faked...

    Cristian Fernando Gutierrez-Ochoa had reportedly been murdered by his father-in-law, the reputed Mexican drug lord known as El Mencho. But authorities arrested him this week in Riverside.