Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The number of perfect matchings in a complete graph K n (with n even) is given by the double factorial (n − 1)!!. [13] The numbers of matchings in complete graphs, without constraining the matchings to be perfect, are given by the telephone numbers. [14] The number of perfect matchings in a graph is also known as the hafnian of its adjacency ...
However, counting the number of perfect matchings, even in bipartite graphs, is #P-complete. This is because computing the permanent of an arbitrary 0–1 matrix (another #P-complete problem) is the same as computing the number of perfect matchings in the bipartite graph having the given matrix as its biadjacency matrix.
The degree sequence of a bipartite graph is the pair of lists each containing the degrees of the two parts and . For example, the complete bipartite graph K 3,5 has degree sequence (,,), (,,,,). Isomorphic bipartite graphs have the same degree sequence. However, the degree sequence does not, in general, uniquely identify a bipartite graph; in ...
The complete bipartite graph K m,n has a vertex covering number of min{m, n} and an edge covering number of max{m, n}. The complete bipartite graph K m,n has a maximum independent set of size max{m, n}. The adjacency matrix of a complete bipartite graph K m,n has eigenvalues √ nm, − √ nm and 0; with multiplicity 1, 1 and n + m − 2 ...
Kőnig had announced in 1914 and published in 1916 the results that every regular bipartite graph has a perfect matching, [11] and more generally that the chromatic index of any bipartite graph (that is, the minimum number of matchings into which it can be partitioned) equals its maximum degree [12] – the latter statement is known as Kőnig's ...
It was conjectured by Lovász and Plummer that the number of perfect matchings contained in a cubic, bridgeless graph is exponential in the number of the vertices of the graph n. [5] The conjecture was first proven for bipartite, cubic, bridgeless graphs by Voorhoeve (1979), later for planar, cubic, bridgeless graphs by Chudnovsky & Seymour (2012).
More efficient algorithms exist for special kinds of bipartite graphs: For sparse bipartite graphs, the maximum matching problem can be solved in ~ (/) with Madry's algorithm based on electric flows. [3] For planar bipartite graphs, the problem can be solved in time O(n log 3 n) where n is the number of vertices, by reducing the problem to ...
One application of the Edmonds matrix of a bipartite graph is that the graph admits a perfect matching if and only if the polynomial det(A ij) in the x ij is not identically zero. Furthermore, the number of perfect matchings is equal to the number of monomials in the polynomial det( A ), and is also equal to the permanent of A {\displaystyle A} .