Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[7] Both the District Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of the Inclusive Communities Project, holding that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [8] The Texas Department of Housing and Community then appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [9]
United States v. Texas, 579 U.S. 547 (2016), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the constitutionality of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) program. In a one-line per curiam decision, an equally divided Court affirmed the lower-court injunction blocking the President Barack Obama's program.
Delgado V. Bastrop Independent School District [1] was a Federal Circuit court case based out of Bastrop county that ruled against the segregation of Mexican-Americans in the public schools of Texas. The court's decision was argued on the standpoint of the Mendez et al. v. Westminster et al. court case and lack of Texas law for segregation of ...
In 2015, a staggering 43.6% of federal patent suits (2,540 suits) were filed in the Eastern District, which was more than the number of lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (545 cases or 9.3%), the United States District Court for the Central District of California (300 cases or 5.1%), the United ...
The district court held that no case law, either in the Supreme Court or the 5th Circuit, prohibits police officers "from making a reasonable inquiry and taking a reasonable step to identify an unknown person who is seen videotaping their place of work and the place where they come and go in their private vehicles."
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas: Full case name: David Resendez Ruiz v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections : Decided: 1980 (original report) Citations: 503 F. Supp. 1265 (S.D. Tex. 1980), 550 F.2d 238: Case history; Prior action: Handwritten petition filed by David Resendez Ruiz ...
Case No. 21-70004 (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) Holding A Texas prison execution protocol banning all spiritual and religious advisors from being in an execution chamber, or touching a prisoner, during an execution is likely to violate the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act's religious protections.
The case was first filed in a state district court before the city moved it to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in 2017. [2] The district court selected to review the matter under intermediate scrutiny based on Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego, rather than the strict scrutiny content-based standard of Reed v.