Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The assertion that Q is necessary for P is colloquially equivalent to "P cannot be true unless Q is true" or "if Q is false, then P is false". [9] [1] By contraposition, this is the same thing as "whenever P is true, so is Q". The logical relation between P and Q is expressed as "if P, then Q" and denoted "P ⇒ Q" (P implies Q).
Now any rational root p/q corresponds to a factor of degree 1 in Q[X] of the polynomial, and its primitive representative is then qx − p, assuming that p and q are coprime. But any multiple in Z [ X ] of qx − p has leading term divisible by q and constant term divisible by p , which proves the statement.
Including 0, the set has a semiring structure (0 being the additive identity), known as the probability semiring; taking logarithms (with a choice of base giving a logarithmic unit) gives an isomorphism with the log semiring (with 0 corresponding to ), and its units (the finite numbers, excluding ) correspond to the positive real numbers.
If the degree of p is greater than the degree of q, then the limit is positive or negative infinity depending on the signs of the leading coefficients; If the degree of p and q are equal, the limit is the leading coefficient of p divided by the leading coefficient of q; If the degree of p is less than the degree of q, the limit is 0.
The most thoroughly researched branch of propositional logic is classical truth-functional propositional logic, [1] in which formulas are interpreted as having precisely one of two possible truth values, the truth value of true or the truth value of false. [19]
Note that if K is Galois over then either r 1 = 0 or r 2 = 0.. Other ways of determining r 1 and r 2 are . use the primitive element theorem to write = (), and then r 1 is the number of conjugates of α that are real, 2r 2 the number that are complex; in other words, if f is the minimal polynomial of α over , then r 1 is the number of real roots and 2r 2 is the number of non-real complex ...
These examples, one from mathematics and one from natural language, illustrate the concept of vacuous truths: "For any integer x, if x > 5 then x > 3." [11] – This statement is true non-vacuously (since some integers are indeed greater than 5), but some of its implications are only vacuously true: for example, when x is the integer 2, the statement implies the vacuous truth that "if 2 > 5 ...
Then, by strong induction, assume this is true for all numbers greater than 1 and less than n. If n is prime, there is nothing more to prove. Otherwise, there are integers a and b, where n = a b, and 1 < a ≤ b < n. By the induction hypothesis, a = p 1 p 2 ⋅⋅⋅ p j and b = q 1 q 2 ⋅⋅⋅ q k are products of primes.