Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Browser extension Firefox Firefox for Android Cookie AutoDelete: Yes Yes Decentraleyes: Yes Yes DownThemAll! Yes No FoxyProxy Standard: Yes Yes HTTPS Everywhere
High-fidelity printing; The PDF.js contributor community also notes that the browser behavior of PDF.js varies with browser support for PDF.js's required features. [28] Performance and reliability will be the best on Chrome and Firefox, which are fully supported and subject to automated testing.
Safari: This bundled web browser has built-in support for reading PDF documents. Firefox: Includes a PDF viewer; Google Chrome: Includes a PDF viewer; Preview: macOS's default PDF viewer; in Mac OS X v10.5 and later, it also can rotate, reorder, annotate, insert, and delete pages. It can also merge files, create new files from existing files ...
In 2017, Mozilla enacted major changes to the application programming interface (API) for extensions in Firefox, replacing the long-standing XUL and XPCOM APIs with the WebExtensions API that is modeled after Google Chrome's API. [2] [3] [4] Thus add-ons that remain compatible with Firefox are now largely compatible with Chrome as well. [5]
Features that the Firefox developers believe will be used by only a small number of its users are not included in Firefox, but instead left to be implemented as extensions. [48] Many Mozilla Suite features, such as IRC chat and calendar have been recreated as Firefox extensions. Extensions are also sometimes a testing ground for features that ...
Firefox originally permitted add-ons to extensively alter its user interface, but this capability was removed in 2017 and replaced with the less-permissive WebExtensions API. [3] [4] Several forks of Firefox retain support for XUL and XPCOM-based add-ons. Waterfox maintains a fork of the legacy Mozilla codebase for the Waterfox Classic browser. [5]
Add-ons are primarily coded using an HTML, CSS, JavaScript, with API known as WebExtensions, which is designed to be compatible with Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge extension systems. [77] Firefox previously supported add-ons using the XUL and XPCOM APIs, which allowed them to directly access and manipulate much of the browser's internal ...
At least within the Firefox software (Tools->Add-ons), Mozila uses "Add-ons" to refer to extensions and themes, not extensions and plug-ins. Plug-ins are a different animal, and work differently with the software.