Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case centres on whether or not somebody with a gender recognition certificate (GRC) recognising their gender as female should be treated as a woman under the 2010 Equality Act.
Section 7 of the Equality Act 2010 lists the protected characteristic of gender reassignment:. 1) A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning the person's sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex.
Etam plc v Rowan [1989] IRLR 150 is a UK labour law case concerning discrimination, and genuine occupational requirements. It would now fall under the Equality Act 2010 Schedule 9. Facts
Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [1] was a case concerning disability discrimination and the application of equality legislation in the United Kingdom, relevant for UK labour law. It replaced the head of disability-related discrimination from the DDA 1995 with the Equality Act 2010 section 15 on discrimination arising from disability.
Veganism, a belief in Scottish independence, gender critical beliefs, opposition to critical race theory with support for the attitude of Martin Luther King towards race, and anti-Zionist beliefs, have all been held to be philosophical beliefs protected under the Equality Act 2010, on the principles set out in the Grainger case.
Supreme Court of the United States: 1971 Roberts v. United States Jaycees: full membership: Supreme Court of the United States: 1984 Rostker v. Goldberg: upholding the Selective Service Act of 1948 requiring only men to register for the military draft: Supreme Court of the United States: 1981 Schultz v. Wheaton Glass Co. equal pay for men and women
Family Law, Liberty, Children Act 1989, Social Services and Well-Being (Wales) Act 2014: The High Court's inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise the deprivation of liberty in order to keep a child safe from harm where no alternative route for safeguarding the child is available (in this case a lack of resource in the child care system).
These groups were 50% of the council’s tenants. The Council wanted to be ‘more sensitive to the needs and experiences of black people’. Tribunal held that because the jobs involved limited contact with the public they did not involve ‘personal services’ [2] under the Race Relations Act 1976 s 5(2)(d). The Employment Appeals Tribunal ...