Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Kentucky Department of Corrections is a state agency of the Kentucky Justice & Public Safety Cabinet that operates state-owned adult correctional facilities and provides oversight for and sets standards for county jails. They also provide training, community based services, and oversees the state's Probation & Parole Division.
Former inmate at California State Prison, Sacramento; pleaded guilty in 2007 to conspiring to wage war against the US for founding an Islamic terrorist group while in prison and planning attacks at LA International Airport and several other targets. [12] [13] David Kernell: 32341-074: Released from custody in November 2011; served 10 months. [14]
Vance was born in Middletown, Ohio, to a mother who struggled with addiction, and he was largely raised by his grandmother, a tough-as-nails self-described hillbilly from Breathitt County.
The Federal Correctional Institution, Manchester (FCI Manchester) is a medium-security United States federal prison for male inmates in unincorporated Clay County, Kentucky. [1] It is operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons, a division of the United States Department of Justice. The facility also has an adjacent satellite prison camp for ...
PurchasePro founder Charles E. Johnson Jr. was arrested after federal authorities moved to revoke his bond in a pending criminal case.
Trump, promising to bring back coal jobs and appoint judges who would do away with a national right to abortion, won the county over Hillary Clinton by a margin of more than 2 to 1 in 2016. He ...
In early 1989, officials from five northwestern Ohio counties and the city of Toledo agreed to create a single regional jail complex. Because Henry County was part of this consortium, the 1882 building ceased to be used for detention purposes; instead, it was converted into offices for the sheriff's department, a call center for the county's 9 ...
Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), facilities that accept federal funds cannot deny prisoners accommodations that are necessary to engage in activities for the practice of their own religious beliefs.