enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Splitting (psychology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)

    Splitting, also called binary thinking, dichotomous thinking, black-and-white thinking, all-or-nothing thinking, or thinking in extremes, is the failure in a person's thinking to bring together the dichotomy of both perceived positive and negative qualities of something into a cohesive, realistic whole.

  3. Cognitive distortion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_distortion

    The "all-or-nothing thinking distortion" is also referred to as "splitting", [20] "black-and-white thinking", [2] and "polarized thinking." [21] Someone with the all-or-nothing thinking distortion looks at life in black and white categories. [15] Either they are a success or a failure; either they are good or bad; there is no in-between.

  4. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Cognitive restructuring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_restructuring

    Cognitive restructuring (CR) is a psychotherapeutic process of learning to identify and dispute irrational or maladaptive thoughts known as cognitive distortions, [1] such as all-or-nothing thinking (splitting), magical thinking, overgeneralization, magnification, [1] and emotional reasoning, which are commonly associated with many mental health disorders. [2]

  6. Cognitive reflection test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_Reflection_Test

    The cognitive reflection test (CRT) is a task designed to measure a person's tendency to override an incorrect "gut" response and engage in further reflection to find a correct answer. However, the validity of the assessment as a measure of "cognitive reflection" or "intuitive thinking" is under question. [ 1 ]

  7. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Referential fallacy [45] – assuming that all words refer to existing things and that the meaning of words reside within the things they refer to, as opposed to words possibly referring to no real object (e.g.: Pegasus) or that the meaning comes from how they are used (e.g.: "nobody" was in the room).

  8. Guilford's Alternate Uses - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilford's_Alternate_Uses

    The AUT measures a certain level of divergent thinking; exploring multiple answers using creativity [1] It doesn't compare to a traditional test that looks for a specific solution. [citation needed] As a result, from the AUT it is measured in four ways: [citation needed] Fluency: the number of other uses you can think of, from the original object

  9. Trial and error - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_and_error

    the perfectionist all-or-nothing method, with no attempt at holding partial successes. This would be expected to take more than 10^301 seconds, [i.e., 2^1000 seconds, or 3·5×(10^291) centuries] a serial-test of switches, holding on to the partial successes (assuming that these are manifest), which would take 500 seconds on average