Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.
About the process. The Good article (GA) process is intentionally lightweight. Anyone who is significantly involved in an article's development can nominate an article and (subject to the next two paragraphs) any registered user can review: multiple votes, consensus building, and committees are not required. [1]
Currently, out of the 6,888,073 articles on Wikipedia, 40,195 are categorized as good articles (about 0.58% or one in 172), which are listed below. An additional 6,582 are listed as featured articles (about 1 in 1,050) and 4,472 as featured lists (about 1 in 1,550). Because articles are only included in one category, a good article that has ...
Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process ...
The topic of the article must be notable: it must have in-depth coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. If you are connected to the topic, don't write about it. Find another topic instead. Make sure there isn't already an article about the topic. The article you write must include citations to the sources you used.
Featured articles are considered to be some of the best articles Wikipedia has to offer, as determined by Wikipedia's editors. They are used by editors as examples for writing other articles. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed as featured article candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to our featured ...
A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...
Wikipedia is a wiki, meaning anyone can edit nearly any 1 page and improve articles immediately. You do not need to register to do this, and anyone who has edited is known as a Wikipedian or editor. Small edits add up, and every editor can be proud to have made Wikipedia better for all. There are two editing interfaces: the new VisualEditor (VE ...