Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This list ranks the top 150 U.S. cities (incorporated places) by 2023 land area. Total areas including water are also given, but when ranked by total area, a number of coastal cities appear disproportionately larger. San Francisco is an extreme example: water makes up nearly 80% of its total area of 232 square miles (601 km 2 ).
Urban area Country Built-up land area (km 2) Population Urban population density (per km 2) San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose (Bay Area) United States: 26,390 9,710,000 953 New York City (New York City Metropolitan Area) United States: 12,093 20,902,000 1,728 Boston–Providence United States: 9,539 7,340,000 769 Tokyo–Yokohama Japan: 8,231 ...
Alex said he believes the highway's construction in New York state was a deliberate attempt to drive certain people out of the area. To this day, the highway casts a massive shadow, separating ...
The city's land area is estimated to be 321 square miles (830 km 2). [2] However, a more recent estimate calculates a total land area of 304.8 square miles (789.4 km 2 ). [ 3 ] Icebergs are often compared in size to the area of Manhattan.
The city's total area is 468.484 square miles (1,213.37 km 2) ... More than twice as many people live in New York City as compared to Los Angeles, ...
The area of Alaska is 18% of the area of the United States and equivalent to 21% of the area of the contiguous United States. The second largest state, Texas, has only 40% of the total area of the largest state, Alaska. Rhode Island is the smallest state by total area and land area. San Bernardino County is the largest county in the contiguous ...
The New York metropolitan area, broadly referred to as the Tri-State area and often also called Greater New York, is the largest metropolitan area in the world by urban landmass, [ 11][ 12][ 13] encompassing 4,669.0 sq mi (12,093 km 2 ). [ 14] The New York metropolitan area is one of the most populous metropolitan areas in the world, the ...
The New York City metro area was ranked by the Brookings Institution as the U.S. metro area with the lowest per-capita transportation-related carbon footprint and as the fourth lowest overall per-capita carbon footprint in 2005 among the 100 largest metro areas of the United States, outranked only by Honolulu, Los Angeles and Portland. [12]