enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mail and wire fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_wire_fraud

    Mail and wire fraud. Mail fraud and wire fraud are terms used in the United States to describe the use of a physical (e.g., the U.S. Postal Service) or electronic (e.g., a phone, a telegram, a fax, or the Internet) mail system to defraud another, and are U.S. federal crimes. Jurisdiction is claimed by the federal government if the illegal ...

  3. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    The statutes most often used to prosecute public corruption are the Hobbs Act, Travel Act, RICO, the program bribery statute, and mail and wire fraud statutes. [ 2 ] These statutes have been upheld as exercises of Congress's Commerce Clause power, or in the case of the mail fraud and program bribery statutes, the Postal Clause and the Spending ...

  4. McNally v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNally_v._United_States

    McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government.

  5. Honest services fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud

    Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (the federal mail and wire fraud statute), added by the United States Congress in 1988, [1] which states "For the purposes of this chapter, the term scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services."

  6. Schmuck v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_v._United_States

    Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705 (1989), is a United States Supreme Court decision on criminal law and procedure.By a 5–4 margin it upheld the mail fraud conviction of an Illinois man and resolved a conflict among the appellate circuits over which test to use to determine if a defendant was entitled to a jury instruction allowing conviction on a lesser included charge.

  7. Cleveland v. United States (2000) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_v._United_States...

    Cleveland v. United States, 531 U.S. 12 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned the definition of "property" under the federal mail fraud statute. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that "property" for the purposes of federal law did not include state video poker licences because such transactions were not a vested right or expectation.

  8. FBI Houston: 53 indicted in wire fraud scheme linked to bail ...

    www.aol.com/news/fbi-houston-other-agencies...

    According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, more than 50 Houston-area residents were indicted in a wire fraud scheme to use false documents to get bail bonds for those charged with criminal offenses ...

  9. List of United States state officials convicted of federal ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), [1] the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, [2] the Travel Act (enacted 1961), [3] the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (enacted 1970), [4] and the federal program bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666 (enacted 1984), [5] permit the ...