Ad
related to: legal standard for summary judgment in federal court
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In American legal practice, summary judgment can be awarded by the court before trial, effectively holding that no trial will be necessary. At the federal level, a summary-judgment motion in United States District Court is governed by Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Other pretrial motions, such as a "motion for judgment on the ...
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case articulating the standard for a trial court to grant summary judgment.Summary judgment will lie when, taking all factual inferences in the non-movant's favor, there exists no genuine issue as to a material fact and the movant deserves judgment as a matter of law.
Judgment on the pleadings is a motion made after pleading and before discovery; summary judgment happens after discovery and before trial; JMOL occurs during trial. [5] In United States federal courts, JMOL is a creation of Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.
Earlier this year in a motion for summary judgment, Beaufort County asked the court to throw out the equal federal protection violation claim, arguing that because the actions happened in prison ...
The Court's decision set forth a two-step analysis for federal courts to use when adjudicating a challenge to an agency's interpretation of a law. This two-step analysis became known as "the Chevron doctrine". [16] First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue.
Holding; To survive a motion for a summary judgment, a plaintiff seeking damages for a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act must present evidence "that tends to exclude the possibility" that the alleged conspirators acted independently, such that the inference of a conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed ...
The lead case applying the summary judgment standard is Doe v. Cahill , [ 11 ] in which a city council member sued an anonymous poster for two allegedly defamatory blog comments. [ 12 ] The Delaware Supreme Court held that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate that the comments were "capable of a defamatory meaning," an essential element of ...
Ad
related to: legal standard for summary judgment in federal court