Ad
related to: legal standard for summary judgment in arkansas
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Commissioner and Flowers moved for summary judgment on the ground that the two unclaimed letters sent by the Commissioner were a constitutionally adequate attempt at notice, and Jones filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner and Flowers, concluding that the Arkansas tax ...
In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, [1] is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case.
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986), is a United States Supreme Court case articulating the standard for a trial court to grant summary judgment.Summary judgment will lie when, taking all factual inferences in the non-movant's favor, there exists no genuine issue as to a material fact and the movant deserves judgment as a matter of law.
Judgment on the pleadings is a motion made after pleading and before discovery; summary judgment happens after discovery and before trial; JMOL occurs during trial. [ 5 ] In United States federal courts , JMOL is a creation of Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure .
Summary execution, an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and then immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial. Summary judgment. A judgment in a summary proceeding, as one rendered pursuant to statute against the sureties on a bond furnished in an action. 50 Am J1st Suret § 209.
Pages in category "United States summary judgment case law" The following 3 pages are in this category, out of 3 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. A.
Arkansas 2 Mike Murphy 2016 Arkansas 3rd 1 Robert J. Gladwin 2002 Arkansas 2 Kenneth Hixson 2022 Arkansas 4th 1 Brandon Harrison, Chief Judge: 2012 Arkansas 2 Stephanie Potter Barrett 2020 Arkansas 5th – Mark Klappenbach 2016 Arkansas - Little Rock: 6th 1 Rita W. Gruber 2008 Arkansas - Little Rock 2 Wendy Wood: 2022 Arkansas - Little Rock 7th –
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. United States, 568 U.S. 23 (2012), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that it was possible for government-induced, temporary flooding to constitute a "taking" of property under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, such that compensation could be owed to the owner of the flooded property.
Ad
related to: legal standard for summary judgment in arkansas