Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There is no clear boundary between the result of the utilitarian design and an object of art, with a classic example provided by cars. An automobile is simultaneously a very utilitarian mean of transportation and a highly personalized extension of ego. [6]
From the line extension to brand extension, however, there are many different types of extension such as "brand alliance", [12] co-branding [13] [14] or "brand franchise extension". [15] Tauber (1988) suggests seven strategies to identify extension cases such as product with parent brand's benefit, same product with different price or quality, etc.
Free software is generally available at no cost and can result in permanently lower TCO (total cost of ownership) compared to proprietary software. [67] With free software, businesses can fit software to their specific needs by changing the software themselves or by hiring programmers to modify it for them.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
For example, Walmart is widely known for its low prices and availability, so this consumer image of the brand would not impact the company negatively. Whereas, if Prada were to start selling a downward product line of low quality, low priced goods this would impact the brand's high status, exclusivity and luxurious image negatively.
Many examples from the video game domain are in the list of commercial video games with later released source code. Popular non-game software examples are the Netscape Communicator which was open-sourced in 1998 [75] [76] and Sun Microsystems's office suite, StarOffice, which was released in October 2000 at its commercial end of life. [77]
If you were to pay 7.44 percent, for example, on $200,000 over 15 years, it’d cost you $132,530 in interest. At 7.12 percent, you’d pay roughly $6,500 less. Pros and cons of a no-closing-cost ...
The adjective free in English is commonly used in one of two meanings: "at no monetary cost" (gratis) or "with little or no restriction" (libre). This ambiguity can cause issues where the distinction is important, as it often is in dealing with laws concerning the use of information , such as copyright and patents .