Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In either case the full quartic can then be divided by the factor (x − 1) or (x + 1) respectively yielding a new cubic polynomial, which can be solved to find the quartic's other roots. If a 1 = a 0 k , {\displaystyle \ a_{1}=a_{0}k\ ,} a 2 = 0 {\displaystyle \ a_{2}=0\ } and a 4 = a 3 k , {\displaystyle \ a_{4}=a_{3}k\ ,} then x = − k ...
The next such cluster of two square-primes comprises 2 2 × 29 = 116, and 3 2 × 13 = 117. 44 has an aliquot sum of 40, within an aliquot sequence of three composite numbers (44, 40, 50, 43, 1, 0) rooted in the prime 43-aliquot tree. Since the greatest prime factor of 44 2 + 1 = 1937 is 149 and thus more than 44 twice, 44 is a Størmer number. [3]
A mathematical constant is a key number whose value is fixed by an unambiguous definition, often referred to by a symbol (e.g., an alphabet letter), or by mathematicians' names to facilitate using it across multiple mathematical problems. [1]
The angle between the horizontal line and the shown diagonal is 1 / 2 (a + b). This is a geometric way to prove the particular tangent half-angle formula that says tan 1 / 2 (a + b) = (sin a + sin b) / (cos a + cos b). The formulae sin 1 / 2 (a + b) and cos 1 / 2 (a + b) are the ratios of the actual distances to ...
For example, 3 is the only prime with period 1, 11 is the only prime with period 2, 37 is the only prime with period 3, 101 is the only prime with period 4, so they are unique primes. The next larger unique prime is 9091 with period 10, though the next larger period is 9 (its prime being 333667).
2. A block of time dedicated to a particular task or purpose. 3. Related to photography. 4. The main part of these words all share something in common (hint: it relates to feathered animals).
[2] [3] [4] For more than 2,000 years, many people had tried and failed to find such constructions; in the 19th century, they were all proven impossible. [5] [6]: 47 Another notable case were "Fermatists", who plagued mathematical institutions with requests to check their proofs of Fermat's Last Theorem. [7] [8]
From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Claes Dahlbäck joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a -40.6 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.