Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case that held by a 5–4 majority that states may charge tax on purchases made from out-of-state sellers even if the seller does not have a physical presence in the taxing state.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Wayfair reported a 2% decline in revenue in the third quarter to $2.9 billion, though it did narrow its generally accepted accounting principles net loss. In January, the company said it was ...
Expect to pay approximately 8% more for your purchases.
The case, filed in the U.S. state of Washington, alleges that Amazon took part in a number of anti-competitive practices. [6] The FTC and states allege Amazon's anticompetitive conduct occurs in two markets—the online superstore market that serves shoppers and the market for online marketplace services purchased by sellers. [7]
Amazon. com, Inc. v. Barnesandnoble. com, Inc., 337 F.3d 1024 (Fed. Cir., 2001), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [1] The ruling was an important early cyberlaw precedent on the matter of the technologies that enable e-commerce and whether such technologies are eligible for patent protection.
Amazon is investing heavily in home decor and furnishings. The new push is already causing issues at Bed Bath & Beyond, which has reported declining sales. Wayfair could also be hurt by the Amazon ...
Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir., 2007) was a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit involving a copyright infringement claim against Amazon.com, Inc. and Google, Inc., by the magazine publisher Perfect 10, Inc.