enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_Mirza_v._State_of...

    Sultana Mirza & Anr. v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2020), a decision of the Allahabad High Court, established that the Constitutional Court bears the responsibility of overseeing and upholding both constitutional morality and the rights of citizens, particularly when these rights are endangered solely due to their sexual orientation.

  3. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The Allahabad High Court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. After the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, [ 9 ] on 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed ...

  4. Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition_of_Unlawful...

    Jurisprudence from High Courts across the country have said that conversion is not a casual matter. In 2014, the Allahabad High Court stated in a judgement that if conversion "is resorted to merely with the object of creating a ground for some claim of right" it would be "a fraud upon the law". [13]

  5. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_v...

    Raj Narain (1975 AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333) was a 1975 case heard by the Allahabad High Court that found the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices. The ruling on the case that had been filed by the defeated opposition candidate, Raj Narain , Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha invalidated Gandhi's win and barred her from ...

  6. Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_dispute

    The Allahabad high court bench, comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, began hearing the case in April 2002, which it would complete by 2010. [102] In 2003, the Archaeological Survey of India began a court-ordered survey to determine if a temple to Lord Rama existed on the site; the survey said there was evidence of a ...

  7. Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahabad_High_Court

    On 25 February 1948, the Chief Court of Oudh was amalgamated with the High Court of Allahabad. Until 2000, what is now called Uttarakhand was part of Uttar Pradesh, and was therefore subject to the jurisdiction of Allahabad High Court. When the new state was created, Allahabad High Court ceased to have jurisdiction over the districts in it.

  8. Category:Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Allahabad_High_Court

    Pages in category "Allahabad High Court" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...

  9. List of landmark court decisions in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    In India, landmark court decisions come most frequently from the Supreme Court of India, which is the highest judicial body in India. High courts of India may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case or if it adopts the holding of the lower court.