Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Meanwhile, a triple negative resolves to a negative meaning, which bares a stronger negativity than a single negative. For example, "我不覺得没有人不知道" (Wǒ bù juédé méiyǒu rén bù zhīdào, "I do not think there is no one who does not know") ambiguously means either "I don't think everyone knows" or "I think someone does not ...
A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.
It was also here that Clarke wrote about the third law in these words: "As three laws were good enough for Newton, I have modestly decided to stop there". The third law is the best known and most widely cited. It was published in a 1968 letter to Science magazine [5] and eventually added to the 1973 revision of the "Hazards of Prophecy" essay. [6]
The idiom, comparing apples and oranges, refers to the differences between items which are popularly thought to be incomparable or incommensurable, such as apples and oranges. The idiom may also indicate that a false analogy has been made between two items, such as where an apple is faulted for not being a good orange.
Apples and oranges are both similar-sized seeded fruits that grow on trees, but that does not make the two interchangeable. A false equivalence or false equivalency is an informal fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning.
Displaying the differences between two or more sets of data, file comparison tools can make computing simpler, and more efficient by focusing on new data and ignoring what did not change. Generically known as a diff [ 18 ] after the Unix diff utility , there are a range of ways to compare data sources and display the results.
Its first printed use came as early as 1991 in William G. Hawkeswood's "One of the Children: An Ethnography of Identity and Gay Black Men," wherein one of the subjects used the word "tea" to mean ...
He also states that one should be careful not to use this ambiguity as an excuse to recklessly violate ethical rules. [3] Conservative journalist Victor Lasky wrote in his book It Didn't Start With Watergate that, while two wrongs do not make a right, if a set of immoral things are done and left unprosecuted, this creates a legal precedent ...