enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Timbs v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbs_v._Indiana

    Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether the excessive fines clause of the Constitution's Eighth Amendment applies to state and local governments.

  3. Jackson v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Indiana

    Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that determined a U.S. state violated due process by involuntarily committing a criminal defendant for an indefinite period of time solely on the basis of his permanent incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him.

  4. Obstruction of justice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obstruction_of_justice_in...

    In federal law, crimes constituting obstruction of justice are defined primarily in Chapter 73 of Title 18 of the United States Code. [ 7 ] [ 8 ] This chapter contains provisions covering various specific crimes such as witness tampering and retaliation, jury tampering , destruction of evidence , assault on a process server , and theft of court ...

  5. Could bar shooting have been prevented? Here's what ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/could-bar-shooting-prevented-heres...

    Evidence of the changes — and their limits — were on display in all three recent shootings. The shooting at 11:11 Bar & Grille was at least the fourth to take place at the location since 2017.

  6. Stump v. Sparkman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_v._Sparkman

    DeKalb County Court House, Auburn, Indiana. The chambers of the Circuit Court judge are at upper left. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), is the leading United States Supreme Court decision on judicial immunity.

  7. Baskin v. Bogan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baskin_v._Bogan

    Lambda Legal filed Baskin v.Bogan in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on March 12, 2014, on behalf of three same-sex couples, all women. Their complaint named as defendants Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller and three county clerks, with one of the county clerks, Penny Bogan, in her official capacity, as the first-named defendant.

  8. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond

    City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that police may not conduct vehicle searches, specifically ones involving drug-sniffing police dogs, at a checkpoint or roadblock without reasonable suspicion. [2]

  9. Indiana Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Supreme_Court

    The entire Court takes part in the annual Judicial Conference of Indiana, which is attended by all of the state's judges, and recommends improvements to the Court and state judiciary. The Court is also responsible for implementing all laws passed by the Indiana General Assembly that affect the judiciary. [12]