Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is not an effective gambit. The reasons why this statement fails to have the intended impact include: Nobody believes you about your donations. There is nothing cheaper than to say that you were going to donate but won't, or that you have donated before but are now going to stop. It costs you nothing, so it's recognized as an easy boast.
Some web browsers allow you to simply Save As... or Print to PDF. Wikipedia's inbuilt Download as PDF option. Other PDF software can be used to create a PDF from the web page, which may give more control over the output. This page offers help with Wikipedia's download tool.
Adding the name of a non-notable individual to a stand-alone list of alumni is bad for several reasons. It undermines Wikipedia's legitimacy as an encyclopedia. Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking sites provide people a forum to discuss their lives. Wikipedia is meant to provide factual information about notable topics.
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Tagged PDF is not required in situations where a PDF file is intended only for print. Since the feature is optional, and since the rules for tagged PDF were relatively vague in ISO 32000-1, support for tagged PDF among consuming devices, including assistive technology (AT), is uneven as of 2021. [ 33 ]
If the file is on Wikipedia, then the file will need to be downloaded, fixed using editing software and reuploaded. the file could be moved to Commons (if it is allowed there — e.g. fair use images are not) and rotated by the bot there (see above).
Wikipedia file names should be clear and descriptive, without being excessively long. While the image name doesn't matter much to the reader (they can reach the description page by simply clicking on the image), it matters for editors.
The different treatment you desire would not be worth the donation. The editors you are talking to are not likely to want a Wikipedia stripped of proper editorial review or to be a more promotional site. A Wikipedia that was friendly to promotional edits would have access to far more money than whatever you are claiming you would have donated.