Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the initial case ([6]) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [7] The FCC appealed to the Supreme Court, [8] and in the 2009 case, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, [9] finding that the new policy was not arbitrary. However, the issue of ...
However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the case Fox et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (06-1760 Archived February 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [6] On the week of March 17, 2008, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear this ...
FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. refers to two related Supreme Court cases: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., upholding regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act
In June 2012, the Supreme Court rescinded several fines issued by the FCC regarding indecent content, including the Fox case stemming from the 2002 Billboard Music Awards. The court ruled that the FCC's change in enforcement policy to target fleeting instances of profanities and nudity on television was too vague, thus violating their rights to ...
The Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office has filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission about the local Fox News... View Article The post Baltimore State’s Attorney’s ...
The primary U.S. media regulator doesn’t have much it can do to punish Fox News for spreading false claims about the 2020 election.
Dominion Voting Systems v Fox Corporation, Superior Court of the State of Delaware , Complaint, Submitted March 15, 2022. Dominion Voting Systems v Fox Corporation, Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Brief in Support of Dominion Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability of Fox News Network, Public version filed February 16, 2023.
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the ability of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to regulate indecent content sent over the broadcast airwaves. [1]