enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_Discrimination_Act

    The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978 (Pub. L. 95–555) is a United States federal statute. It amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to "prohibit sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy." [1] [2] The Act covers discrimination "on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions."

  3. General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Co._v...

    General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), is a 1976 United States Supreme Court case authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist concerning gender-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that pregnancy could reasonably be excluded from an employer's the disability ...

  4. United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Automobile_Workers...

    United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 499 U.S. 187 (1991), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that private sector policies prohibiting women from knowingly working in potentially hazardous occupations are discriminatory and in violation of Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978. [1]

  5. New rules for Pregnant Workers Fairness Act include divisive ...

    www.aol.com/news/rules-pregnant-workers-fairness...

    The 1978 law, which amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibited discrimination on the basis of pregnancy and marked a major shift for gender equality at time when pregnant women ...

  6. California Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Guerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Federal_Savings...

    Case history; Prior: 758 F.2d 390 (9th Cir. 1985): Holding § 12945(b)(2) is not preempted by Title VII, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, because it is not inconsistent with the purposes of Title VII, nor does it require the doing of an act that is unlawful under Title VII.

  7. Pregnancy discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pregnancy_discrimination

    The Court of Appeals declared this was unconstitutional and illegal discrimination on the basis of sex under both Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. This decision ultimately became an important precedent that it is illegal to discharge an employee due to expressing milk or lactation. In 2014 the Supreme Court heard Young v.

  8. US employers must accommodate abortions, birth control ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-employers-must-accommodate...

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) unveiled a rule to implement the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a law that Congress passed with bipartisan support and the backing of major ...

  9. Young v. United Parcel Service - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young_v._United_Parcel_Service

    In 1978, the United States Congress passed the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, amending Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to "prohibit sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy," as a direct response to the Court's ruling in General Electric Company v.