Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An odd number does not have the prime factor 2. The first: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23 (sequence A005408 in the OEIS). All integers are either even or odd. A square has even multiplicity for all prime factors (it is of the form a 2 for some a). The first: 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144 (sequence A000290 in the OEIS).
This is a list of articles about prime numbers.A prime number (or prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself. By Euclid's theorem, there are an infinite number of prime numbers.
For example, 3 is a divisor of 21, since 21/7 = 3 (and therefore 7 is also a divisor of 21). If m is a divisor of n , then so is − m . The tables below only list positive divisors.
The sum of its factors (including one and itself) sum to 360, exactly three times 120. Perfect numbers are order two ( 2-perfect ) by the same definition. 120 is the sum of a twin prime pair (59 + 61) and the sum of four consecutive prime numbers (23 + 29 + 31 + 37), four consecutive powers of two (8 + 16 + 32 + 64), and four consecutive powers ...
4,2,1,1,1 9 120 29 83160 3,3,1,1,1 9 ... (a 22 to a 228) are factors with exponent equal to one ... the last exponent c k must equal 1. It means that 1, 4, and 36 are ...
Every positive integer greater than 1 is either the product of two or more integer factors greater than 1, in which case it is a composite number, or it is not, in which case it is a prime number. For example, 15 is a composite number because 15 = 3 · 5 , but 7 is a prime number because it cannot be decomposed in this way.
[1] [2] The exponents p corresponding to Mersenne primes must themselves be prime, although the vast majority of primes p do not lead to Mersenne primes—for example, 2 11 − 1 = 2047 = 23 × 89. [3] Perfect numbers are natural numbers that equal the sum of their positive proper divisors, which are divisors
It can be proven that: . For a given prime number p, if n is p-perfect and p does not divide n, then pn is (p + 1)-perfect.This implies that an integer n is a 3-perfect number divisible by 2 but not by 4, if and only if n/2 is an odd perfect number, of which none are known.