enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Grammarly - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammarly

   By 2015, Grammarly had one million active daily users. [8] That same year, it began offering its flagship product via a freemium model that allowed all users access to the product's basic capabilities while placing more sophisticated features like style recommendations and plagiarism detection behind a paywall.

3. Software cracking - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_cracking

   Software crack illustration. Software cracking (known as "breaking" mostly in the 1980s [1]) is an act of removing copy protection from a software. [2] Copy protection can be removed by applying a specific crack. A crack can mean any tool that enables breaking software protection, a stolen product key, or guessed password. Cracking software ...

4. Comparison of download managers - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_download...

   Free Download Manager: ... Remote Access/Control Modified Time-stamp preserved See also. Free and open-source software portal; Comparison of BitTorrent clients;

5. Comparison of anti-plagiarism software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_anti...

   Grammarly: Grammarly, Inc. 2016 freemium: SaaS: Latin Checks against ProQuest databases and (public) web pages. [3] HelioBLAST: Virginia Bioinformatics Institute? (free of charge web service) Latin Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed. [4] iThenticate: iParadigms 2004 2017 proprietary ...

6. Paradox (warez) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_(warez)

   Paradox has been noted to crack challenging dongle protections on many debugging and software development programs. The team also successfully found a method of bypassing activation in Windows Vista. [5] This was accomplished by emulating an OEM machine's BIOS-embedded licensing information and installing an OEM license. [6]

7. Software protection dongle - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_protection_dongle

   There are potential weaknesses in the implementation of the protocol between the dongle and the copy-controlled software. For example, a simple implementation might define a function to check for the dongle's presence, returning "true" or "false" accordingly, but the dongle requirement can be easily circumvented by modifying the software to always answer "true".