enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Obscenity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obscenity

    163. (1) Every person commits an offence who makes, prints, publishes, distributes, circulates or has in their possession for the purpose of publication, distribution or circulation any obscene written matter, picture, model, phonograph record or any other obscene thing. The Canada Border Services Agency seizes items it labels obscene.

  3. United States obscenity law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_obscenity_law

    There does not exist a specific listing of material that is obscene apart from court decisions holding material obscene in particular communities. Title 18, chapter 71 of the U.S. Code makes obscene material illegal. The Citizen's Guide to U.S. Federal Law on Obscenity lists several relevant statutes regarding obscenity. [5]

  4. Miller test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test

    The work is considered obscene only if all three conditions are satisfied. [citation needed] The first two prongs of the Miller test are held to the standards of the community, and the third prong is based on "whether a reasonable person would find such value in the material, taken as a whole". [5] For legal scholars, several issues are important.

  5. Legal objections to pornography in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_objections_to...

    In the United States, distribution of "obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy" materials is a federal crime. [1] The determination of what is "obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy" is up to a jury in a trial, which must apply the Miller test; however, due to the prominence of pornography in most communities most pornographic materials are not considered "patently offensive" in the Miller test.

  6. Community standards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_standards

    [2] With its emphasis on the reaction of an average person rather than that of an especially susceptible person, the court rejected applying the Hicklin test as a means of determining whether material is obscene, and the ruling represented a liberalization of the nation's obscenity laws. [3] The concept was further refined in the matter of ...

  7. 40+ Phrases You Can Use to Amp up Your Dirty Talk - AOL

    www.aol.com/beginners-guide-talking-dirty-bed...

    The reverse is helpful, too: react appropriately to what your partner says. If something they said really turns you on, tell them that! Open communication is the key to the best dirty talk (shocker!).

  8. These Stars Get Paid Obscene Amounts of Money To Post ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/stars-paid-obscene-amounts-money...

    Major celebrities like Kylie Jenner and Selena Gomez can make a killing off a single Instagram post. But stars from reality TV shows like "The Bachelor" and the "The Real Housewives" franchises...

  9. Roth v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States

    Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), along with its companion case Alberts v.California, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which redefined the constitutional test for determining what constitutes obscene material unprotected by the First Amendment. [1]