enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of X Window System desktop environments

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_X_Window...

    A 2011 test by Phoronix with the default installation of Ubuntu 10.04 showed that LXDE 0.5's memory utilization was lower than that of Xfce 4.6, which in turn was lower than that of GNOME 2.29, with KDE 4.4 using the most RAM compared to the aforementioned desktops. [30] [31]

  3. Comparison of X window managers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_X_window...

    2024-10-20 MIT: Matchbox: Stacking: C: 2007-04-13 1.2.3 [24] 2023-03-15 GPL-2.0-or-later: Metacity (GNOME 2) Compositing: C, C++ (GTK+) 2002-10 3.54.0 [25] 2024-10-05 GPL-2.0-or-later: Moksha (E17) Compositing: C: 2015-08-11 0.4.1 [26] 2023-07-23 Motif Window Manager (mwm) Stacking: C: 1989 2.3.8 [27] 2017-12-05 LGPL-2.1-or-later: Mutter (GNOME ...

  4. X window manager - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_window_manager

    Xfce's Xfwm (since 4.2 of 2004 [citation needed] or 2005 Xfce 4.2.0 released!), Unity's Compiz (since 2005—was forked as Beryl in 2006 but the projects re-merged in 2007), and; KDE's KWin (since 4.0 of 2008). Compositing support can be added to non-compositing window managers, through the use of compositors such as compton.

  5. Xfce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfce

    Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment which omits many of the visually appealing features (such as animations) present in other desktop environments such as KDE Plasma and GNOME. These omissions allow Xfce to run much more smoothly on low-end personal computers .

  6. LXDE - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LXDE

    In 2010, tests suggested that LXDE 0.5 had the lowest memory-usage of the four most-popular desktop environments of the time (the others being GNOME 2.29, KDE Plasma Desktop 4.4, and Xfce 4.6), [7] and that it consumed less energy, [8] which suggested mobile computers with Linux distributions running LXDE 0.5 drained their batteries at a slower ...

  7. Comparison of Linux distributions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux...

    This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.The specific problem is: Active distributions composed entirely of free software (Dragora GNU/Linux-Libre, gNewSense, Guix System, LibreCMC, Musix GNU+Linux, Parabola GNU/Linux-libre, and Trisquel) need information in all sub categories, #General is complete.

  8. ROSA Linux - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROSA_Linux

    ROSA is a fairly elegant distribution, with a simple, clean layout, a handful of posh icons, windows-like decorations, and a classy menu. All in all, you would be tempted to guess what desktop environment you're working in, as the customized KDE leans toward more Gnome-like features.

  9. Linux range of use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_range_of_use

    The popularity of Linux on standard desktop computers and laptops has been increasing over the years. [2] Most modern distributions include a graphical user environment, with, as of February 2015, the three most popular environments being the KDE Plasma Desktop, Xfce and GNOME.