Ads
related to: sample format for article review essay- Grammarly for Mac
Get writing suggestions across an
array of desktop apps and websites.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Grammarly for Mac
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of this article about a famous painting
Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.
The article is reasonably well-written – the prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate – illustrations are encouraged, though not required.
If an article overall has so many images that they lengthen the page beyond the length of the text itself, you can use a gallery; or you can create a page or category combining all of them at Wikimedia Commons and use a relevant template ({}, {{Commons category}}, {{Commons-inline}} or {{Commons category-inline}}) to link to it instead, so that ...
I've listed this article for peer review because... Thinking about trying to shepherd this up to GA and possibly FA. All insights welcome, would love to get some feedback on structuring and style - art articles like this require a decent amount of analysis and opinion from critics and art historians, and it can be hard to know how best to incorporate a range of views/opinions/ideas.
Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2. Featured article ...
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).
For a citation to appear in a footnote, it needs to be enclosed in "ref" tags. You can add these by typing <ref> at the front of the citation and </ref> at the end. . Alternatively you may notice above the edit box there is a row of "markup" formatting buttons which include a <ref></ref> button to the right—if you highlight your whole citation and then click this markup button, it will ...
Ads
related to: sample format for article review essay