enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The IV Amendment decreed the seats for minorities and non-Muslims representation to the government of Pakistan and the Parliament of Pakistan, to protect the minority rights in the country. [1] The IV Amendment also deprived courts of the power to grant bail to any accused or innocent [person] until proven guilty under any preventive detention. [1]

  3. Soldal v. Cook County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldal_v._Cook_County

    The Fourth Amendment protects both property as well as privacy interests. Even absent a search or an arrest, a seizure of property implicates the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment applies not only to seizures made within a criminal context, but also to those made within a civil context as well. The case was reversed and remanded.

  4. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to the length of a seizure, a federal court ruled last week, significantly restricting how long law enforcement ...

  5. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  6. Arizona v. Hicks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_v._Hicks

    The Fourth Amendment guards against unreasonable "searches" and "seizures." The Court first ruled that when the police officer moved the stereo equipment to record the serial numbers, he conducted a Fourth Amendment "search," unrelated to the initial reason the police were in Hicks's apartment, to search for weapons and the person who fired the bullet through the floor of the apartment.

  7. United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Verdugo...

    United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do not apply to searches and seizures by United States agents of property owned by a nonresident alien in a foreign country. [1]

  8. Kentucky v. King - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_v._King

    The Fourth Amendment requires searches and seizures be reasonable. The Court has held a search or seizure without a warrant presumptively unreasonable. However, there are many exceptions to the warrant requirement, including exigent circumstances, search incident to arrest, consent search, plain view, automobile exception, and border search exception.

  9. South Dakota v. Opperman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Opperman

    Under the Fourth Amendment, "unreasonable" searches and seizures are forbidden. In addition to their law-enforcement duties, the police must engage in what the court has termed a community caretaking role, including such duties as removing obstructions from roadways to ensure the free flow of traffic.