Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This process of top-down induction of decision trees (TDIDT) [5] is an example of a greedy algorithm, and it is by far the most common strategy for learning decision trees from data. [ 6 ] In data mining , decision trees can be described also as the combination of mathematical and computational techniques to aid the description, categorization ...
Decision Tree Model. In computational complexity theory, the decision tree model is the model of computation in which an algorithm can be considered to be a decision tree, i.e. a sequence of queries or tests that are done adaptively, so the outcome of previous tests can influence the tests performed next.
The problem may be solved by sorting the list and then checking if there are any consecutive equal elements; it may also be solved in linear expected time by a randomized algorithm that inserts each item into a hash table and compares only those elements that are placed in the same hash table cell. [1]
Decision trees can also be seen as generative models of induction rules from empirical data. An optimal decision tree is then defined as a tree that accounts for most of the data, while minimizing the number of levels (or "questions"). [8] Several algorithms to generate such optimal trees have been devised, such as ID3/4/5, [9] CLS, ASSISTANT ...
Potential ID3-generated decision tree. Attributes are arranged as nodes by ability to classify examples. Values of attributes are represented by branches. In decision tree learning, ID3 (Iterative Dichotomiser 3) is an algorithm invented by Ross Quinlan [1] used to generate a decision tree from a dataset.
In decision tree learning, greedy algorithms are commonly used, however they are not guaranteed to find the optimal solution. One popular such algorithm is the ID3 algorithm for decision tree construction. Dijkstra's algorithm and the related A* search algorithm are verifiably optimal greedy algorithms for graph search and shortest path finding.
First, it can be false in practice. A theoretical polynomial algorithm may have extremely large constant factors or exponents, rendering it impractical. For example, the problem of deciding whether a graph G contains H as a minor, where H is fixed, can be solved in a running time of O(n 2), [25] where n is the number of vertices in G.
In game theory, backward induction is a solution methodology that follows from applying sequential rationality to identify an optimal action for each information set in a given game tree. It develops the implications of rationality via individual information sets in the extensive-form representation of a game.