Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is a list of states and union territories of India ranked according to poverty as of 2022 (2021–22) as hosted by NITI Aayog's Sustainable Development Goals dashboard; and Reserve Bank of India's 'Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy'.
The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) was developed in 2010 by the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative (OPHI) and the United Nations Development Programme [4] and uses health, education and standard of living indicators to determine the incidence and intensity of poverty experienced by a population.
This article lists the Human Development Index (HDI) rating of the States and union territories of India.. HDI is a composite index that takes into consideration health, education and income.
National Statistical Office (NSO) is mandated with the following responsibilities: acts as the nodal agency for planned development of the statistical system in the country, lays down and maintains norms and standards in the field of statistics, involving concepts and definitions, methodology of data collection, processing of data and dissemination of results;
10 Trichy: 0.774 11 Vellore: 0.742 12 Namakkal: 0.738 13 Cuddalore: 0.719 - Tamil Nadu: 0.709: Medium human development 14 Dindigul: 0.691 15 Madurai: 0.689 16 Sivaganga: 0.671 17 Salem: 0.669 18 Karur: 0.668 19 Thanjavur: 0.655 20 Ramanathapuram: 0.653 21 Dharmapuri: 0.644 22 Pudukottai: 0.631 23 Tiruppur: 0.627 24 The Nilgiris: 0.624 25 Erode ...
24.3% of the population earned less than US$1 (PPP, around US$0.25 in nominal terms) a day in 2005, down from 42.1% in 1981. [8] [9] 41.6% of its population (540 million people approx.) is living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 (PPP) per day, down from 59.8% in 1981. [8]
The NITI Aayog (lit. ' Policy Commission '; abbreviation for National Institution for Transforming India) serves as the apex public policy think tank of the Government of the Republic of India, and the nodal agency tasked with catalyzing economic development, and fostering cooperative federalism and moving away from bargaining federalism through the involvement of State Governments of India in ...
Indicators used are: Probability at birth of not surviving to age 60 (% of cohort), 2000–2005. Varies from 7.1% for Japan to 11.8% for the USA. This is the indicator that is best known for all countries (including the ones not on the list). The US has specific values associated with disease characteristics of poverty.