enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles search
  2. courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Miller (1976) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller_(1976)

    The Supreme Court remanded Miller's case back to the Fifth Circuit. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. dissented, identifying that a similar case, Burrows v. Superior Court, [5] had been decided in the California Supreme Court that ruled that bank records were protected under the Fourth Amendment, in a manner consistent with California Bankers Ass'n v.

  3. Discover Bank v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Discover_Bank_v._Superior_Court

    Discover Bank v. Superior Court (30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76) is a 2005 case where the California Supreme Court ruled that an arbitration clause was unenforceable because a class-action waiver contained within it would exculpate Discover Bank from liability for wrongdoing involving small sums of damages.

  4. Rochin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochin_v._California

    Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that added behavior that "shocks the conscience" into tests of what violates due process clause of the 14th Amendment. [1]

  5. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  6. City of L.A. Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_L.A._Dep't_of_Water...

    City of Los Angeles Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702 (1978) is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that employers cannot charge women more for pension benefits, despite women living longer than men, on average, and therefore receiving more retirement benefits.

  7. A class-action lawsuit offers free cash to many LADWP ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/class-action-lawsuit-offers...

    In a tentative settlement, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has agreed to repay customers who were charged too much for sewer service from May 2016 to June 2022.

  8. Top advisor to D.A. Gascón charged with illegal use of ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/top-advisor-l-district-attorney...

    One of Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. George Gascón's top advisors, Diana Teran, right, was charged Wednesday with illegal use of confidential law enforcement records. (Jason Armond / Los Angeles ...

  9. Los Angeles County Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_County...

    The Superior Court of Los Angeles County is the California Superior Court located in Los Angeles County. It is the largest single unified trial court in the United States. The Superior Court operates 36 courthouses throughout the county. Currently, the Presiding Judge is Sergio C. Tapia II and David W. Slayton is the Executive Officer/Clerk of ...

  1. Ad

    related to: bank charges court case summary los angeles search